tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4439320666659696765.post5039104104717530983..comments2023-10-24T07:43:13.745-04:00Comments on Things You Can't Take Back: SAFE's Cindy Ho curates show of Naxi art!Meg Lamberthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10534877373907555299noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4439320666659696765.post-21556784570461661412011-07-09T17:06:48.753-04:002011-07-09T17:06:48.753-04:00"that may actually be illicit?"
Eh? On w..."that may actually be illicit?"<br />Eh? On what basis does he assert this? <br /><br />"certainly by Cultural Property Nationalist standards unethical". <br />Eh? On what basis does he assert this? To whom is he referring? <br /><br />Actually, I think Sayles has not the foggiest idea what he is talking about here.<br /><br />Most of this material is held in public institutions in the US - like the Library of Congress, is Sayles accusing it of retaining material acquired by unethical means? <br /><br />Paul BarfordPaul Barfordhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10443302899233809948noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4439320666659696765.post-52903918939277354822011-07-04T10:07:40.272-04:002011-07-04T10:07:40.272-04:00Mr. Sayles,
For more information on Cindy Ho'...Mr. Sayles,<br /><br />For more information on Cindy Ho's exhibition, please see this article: http://paul-barford.blogspot.com/2011/07/what-bailey-and-ehrenberg-should-know.html<br /><br />There is nothing illicit about this exhibition, and I hope you will be able to learn about the Naxi, whether you see the show in person or simply visit the website!Meg Lamberthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10534877373907555299noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4439320666659696765.post-1959641612997323972011-06-28T19:03:30.362-04:002011-06-28T19:03:30.362-04:00Am I dreaming, or is Cindy Ho promoting artifacts ...Am I dreaming, or is Cindy Ho promoting artifacts from a private collection that may actually be illicit? If not illicit, certainly by Cultural Property Nationalist standards unethical. How does this differ from Chinese coins, existing in the billions, that Ms. Ho had advocated restricting from private ownership? Do I detect a double standard here?Wayne G. Sayleshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02443529723963083983noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4439320666659696765.post-27199870898664090022011-06-26T19:50:03.041-04:002011-06-26T19:50:03.041-04:00Hear, hear! Congratulations, indeed.Hear, hear! Congratulations, indeed.Damien Hufferhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01808464886332759165noreply@blogger.com